MMBase

Support for GraphicsMagick.

Details

  • Type: New Feature New Feature
  • Status: Resolved Resolved
  • Priority: Minor Minor
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 1.9.2
  • Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
  • Component/s: Resources
  • Description:
    Hide
    michiel@sepio:~$ convert -version
    GraphicsMagick 1.1.11 2008-02-23 Q8 http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
    Copyright (C) 2002-2007 GraphicsMagick Group.
    Additional copyrights and licenses apply to this software.

    Debian ships 'graphicsmagick' which is about the same as image-magick, but the version numbers are different. Code which checks for version numbers should be overriden to reflect the correct supported version of graphicsmagick.


    In this case the code supposes that it is deailing with imagemagick version 1.1.11. Most of the time this doesn't make much differnce, but a few details may go wrong.
    Show
    michiel@sepio:~$ convert -version GraphicsMagick 1.1.11 2008-02-23 Q8 http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ Copyright (C) 2002-2007 GraphicsMagick Group. Additional copyrights and licenses apply to this software. Debian ships 'graphicsmagick' which is about the same as image-magick, but the version numbers are different. Code which checks for version numbers should be overriden to reflect the correct supported version of graphicsmagick. In this case the code supposes that it is deailing with imagemagick version 1.1.11. Most of the time this doesn't make much differnce, but a few details may go wrong.

Activity

Hide
Michiel Meeuwissen added a comment - 2010-02-09 11:30
For now graphicsmagick is detected and is supposed to be equivalent to imagemagick version: graphicsmagick version + 5.0.0.

I've no idea how much sense that makes, but at least a bit, because there is at least one check which now is correctly entered.
Show
Michiel Meeuwissen added a comment - 2010-02-09 11:30 For now graphicsmagick is detected and is supposed to be equivalent to imagemagick version: graphicsmagick version + 5.0.0. I've no idea how much sense that makes, but at least a bit, because there is at least one check which now is correctly entered.

People

Dates

  • Created:
    2010-01-07 10:27
    Updated:
    2010-02-09 11:30
    Resolved:
    2010-02-08 18:43